Skip to main content

Lockdown fatigue is making restrictions less effective

In Australia, the lockdown in Melbourne in July was of similar intensity to the initial lockdown in April. Even so, retail sales only fell by 2% m/m in Victoria which still left them around 2% above pre-virus levels. Part of that strength may reflect renewed panic buying. But it’s clear that the second lockdown did not curb spending by nearly as much as the first, which resulted in retail sales falling 15% below pre-virus levels. That probably reflects growing fatigue with restrictions on activity and less fear of getting the virus. The result of the weaker adherence was that the spread of the virus continued and a stricter lockdown had to be imposed in August. The second lockdown looks to have been more effective at reducing activity with Apple Maps movement data showing fewer routing requests than in April. What’s more, the recovery in other states appears to be stalling. A larger hit to consumption in August and beyond is inevitable but we still expect GDP to expand in Q3.

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.