The bears’ argument that the valuation of the US stock market is unsustainably high is typically made by comparing the current level of Shiller’scyclically-adjusted price/earnings ratio (CAPE) for the S&P Composite, which is around 26, with its average since 1881, which is only about 14. However, the bears’ argument assumes that this average is a “normal” level to which the CAPE ought to revert. This assumption is wrong if, as we believe, there has been a decline in the equilibrium level of investors’ required real return from US equities, for which the cyclically adjusted earnings yield (CAEY) – that is, the inverse of the CAPE – is an approximation.
Become a client to read more
This is premium content that requires an active Capital Economics subscription to view.
Already have an account?
You may already have access to this premium content as part of a paid subscription.
Sign in to read the content in full or get details of how you can access it
Register for free
Sign up for a free account to gain:
- Unlock additional content
- Register for Capital Economics events
- Receive email updates and economist-curated newsletters
- Request a free trial of our services