Skip to main content

Direct economic effects of CRE rout will be limited

We expect rising interest rates and structural headwinds to trigger a deep rout in commercial real estate. The impacts on the real economy will be mostly indirect via the impact on small bank lending, however, rather than the direct impact on construction and development activity. While residential investment accounted for 6.5% of GDP at the 2007 peak of the housing bubble (and bottomed out at little more than 2% a few years later), non-residential structures investment is only 2.6% of GDP now. Moreover, investment in the most-affected office and retail sectors, which face the biggest headwinds from the shift to working from home and online selling, together account for less than 0.5% of GDP. In addition, rather than contracting, non-residential construction spending has been growing strongly of late, driven by gains in manufacturing and non-retail commercial, such as warehouses. Most remarkably, even office and retail construction spending has rallied, illustrating that the direct impact from the coming commercial real estate slump will be limited

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.