Skip to main content

Cutting the IOER rate would be too risky

Cutting the interest on excess reserves (IOER) rate may seem like a simple way for the Fed to signal its intent to leave short rates at near-zero for several more years, at the same time as it begins to taper its asset purchases. However, even a small reduction could trigger a sequence of potentially troublesome events. If the Fed is determined to cut the IOER rate it might make sense to leave the rate payable on required reserves unchanged at 0.25%. That would at least give banks an incentive to expand their balance sheets by making more loans.

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.